I was at the National Environmental Conference yesterday with Billah, Husrin and Tiqah. The conference centered its attention towards trying to develop Brunei with “green” being one of its criteria. Brunei Darussalam is well known, publicly and worldwide – not for its oil and gas only but also for its richness in biodiversity and the pristine greenery that still exist; with some parts of it, minimal to human impact.
But that wasn’t highlighted at the conference. There were talks about Smoke Haze, a presentation given by Dr.Rajasekhar Balsubramanian from NUS, Singapore and also about Waste Management System by Dr Jerry Leonard from Canada. Excellent speeches I must say but personally, I could not see how such speeches are anywhere fruitful if specific questions are unasked and unanswered. For instance, there are evidences to show that some systems do work in other countries but are we adopting their techniques to our country without considering some rather important aspect like culture and customary routine? and if we do, are we going to keep negotiating about what’s best without actually starting a project? Perhaps I’m being too critical without taking everything into consideration but the whole picture so far shows more initiatives are taking place without actual progress.
Now, because we know how important it is to keep a country clean and more important to always remember to REUSE, REDUCE, RECYCLE and after listening to the speakers yesterday, we must also RECOVER and to have RESPONSIBILITY. No, no more 3Rs, it’s 5 Rs now! But what is the point to have everything planned out but no support from the majority? To make a difference, oh one can indeed make a difference but it takes every individual to make a real change, a real significant change!
Trust me, you don’t need to be Einstein to know how to reuse plastics, reduce electricity consumption when not needed and to recycle unwanted goods. Yes, I do mean goods because someone’s waste is another’s raw-material! Indeed, such a statement can only be made after hearing Ms Anita Roper from Australia that gave a talk on “How Green Business can be Good Business”. In pure honesty, there were alot of questions, relevant to private and government sectors whom would like to start going green but they just don’t know where to start. Thus, addressing their queries aloud. At the end of the discussion, the main point drawn was basically for individuals, companies, private and government sectors to take the risk on implementing a well-drawn up plan.
The last presentation was on “How BSB can be a Sustainable City – Ideas and Suggestions”, presented by Dr Djoko Prihanto. He gave a very well drawn up presentation with many technical aspects of town planning – what should be done and so forth. I was however very disappointed when “sustainability” was not highlighted in the presentation. Well, I guess it’s more correct to say that emphasis on sustainability did not touch close to what I thought of sustainability.
Sustainability is basically to allow us, this generation of homo sapiens to consume as much as not to impede the next generation from having what we currently have. We cannot consume more than we need for that is not sustainable. We cannot destroy if we don’t need to destroy for if such is done for the sake of development then such a development is ruthlessly unfruitful. Why? Because a balance is not achieved. A balance is needed to be achieved from all aspects of economy, social and environment before true development takes place.
This then tempted me to raise a question- which I should have asked only did not manage to yesterday. If an area is found to have endangered species (and I do mean being endangered worldwide), would you strip that area for development? Would that be sustainable? What would you suggest?
Yesterday’s conference allowed me to meet with many fantastic people and speakers. It’s one of those types that make you really think and would really like to make a difference!
Shouted too at Brudirect [215hits @ August30th].
They Spoke